The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the introduction.
As tempting as it may be, avoid over-using the grammatical first person. Finally, our data describing strong correlation between noise correlation during on-going activity and during auditory stimuli support the idea that distributed groups of interconnected neurons are coactivated during tone stimulation.
Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant. You must write your abstract last. Our data, however, put additional constraints on this connectivity model.
Be sure to discuss how their work is relevant to your work. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem.
Structure and Writing Style These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: Then discuss the results and indicate whether they meet your expectations. Refer back to problem posed, and describe the conclusions that you reached from carrying out this investigation, summarize new observations, new interpretations, and new insights that have resulted from the present work.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. Despite the local disorder, large-scale organizing principles do exist.
Write the discussion, just as the dissertation conclusion, primarily in the present tense. If applicable, begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most significant or unanticipated finding first, then systematically review each finding.
What is the significance of the present results: The simplest connectivity model to consider would be that of a tonotopic input combined with locally random noisy connectivity.
Figures should be oriented vertically, in portrait mode, wherever possible. Final thesis should be bound.
If your study encompasses an active process, researchers writing a good thesis discussion on the same process in the ancient record. Got any tips on the discussion chapter? You should write a direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results, usually in one paragraph.
It is also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all.
Examine your figures with these questions in mind: Possible causes and consequences of the results are discussed. Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section.
When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Suggestions for possible follow-up research are made.
The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded in the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes. Name these, but also explain how these factors can be improved in future research. Remember there are many ways to skin the discussion cat.
At this point, make sure you have sufficiently justified your methodological decisions in the methodology part of your thesis. These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.
If the data are in the public domain, could another researcher lay his or her hands on the identical data set? As much as possible, the captions should stand alone in explaining the plots and tables.
Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses if you do not plan to do so in the conclusion of the paper. This will give your conclusions more credence.
However, our data revealed a highly heterogeneous local population in which neighboring neurons could have very similar or very different response properties.
Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons. You can use a couple of basic techniques to help you with this process: Desciption of your analystical methods, including reference to any specialized statistical software.
I remember struggling with this section myself and, looking back, I believe there were two sources of anxiety.What this handout is about. This handout describes what a thesis statement is, how thesis statements work in your writing, and how you can craft or refine one for your draft.
How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Always write the discussion for the reader; remember that the focus should be to help the That is a good example of a direct, declar-ative, and succinct proclamation of the study results.
Importance of a Good Discussion The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January ): ; Kretchmer, Paul.
The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis. The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called “discussion”, but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well – that’s where the creative magic of the PhD happens.
Order of Writing Your thesis is not written in the same order as it is presented in. The following gives you one idea how to proceed. discipline. You must describe your results, but you must NOT interpret them.
(If good ideas occur to you at this time, save them at the bottom of the page for the discussion section.) In writing the. How do I start my discussion chapter?
At the University of Melbourne we used to talk about how a good thesis has a Thanks for your comments, and thanks for the post! I am in the process of writing my discussion, and tried the questions of “so what?” and found that i got stumped. I really think my thesis is boring, not adding.Download