That is basically what interests me—the double question of understanding our own biases, but also understanding the potential of using this indirect information and these indirect cues of quality of reputation in order to navigate this enormous amount of knowledge.
Probably we have this disposition of sharing information immediately which was less exploited by other social configurations, like the way in which knowledge and information used to circulate fifty years ago, and which is highlighted and made more explicit by this social configuration.
We have a freedom that we didn't have twenty or thirty years ago. If they are, be careful.
On eBay reputation is purely social information. This becomes a problem if the super-prolific reviewers are unrepresentative of their audience.
And even more time to rebuild a damaged one. Buyer and seller, driver and rider, or host and client can rate each other, with profound consequences for the other. Therefore, nothing is actually trivial in our lives.
There are traditions in social sciences like economics, and part of sociology, which are highly formalized and that use models, so this is not just poetry. In the moral life, as in life itself, we take one step at a time.
Maybe we can use the connectionist models of the brain in order to understand how Internet works, and how it develops, because it was growing, growing, growing.
Do your best no matter how trivial the task. I started to work on this, and I discovered many interesting things. Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, fix your thoughts on such things.
Figure out if you need a new group of friends. What are the inferential consequences that can grow from that chunk of information? This is something that could be good for education, etc. If you're prestigious in academia, you will have more prestige, and if you're just marginal, the tendency will be that you will be more and more marginal.
In most cases, however, argumentation and trust work hand in hand. Perhaps a rare one-star review of a five-star restaurant should be given less weight.
But what does it mean? And so does ethics.
In a sense we are more uncertain about the results of research, but, at least in the intellectual debate, we should avoid polarization.There are a lot of misconceptions about online reputation management. Some people think it’s just social media monitoring, while others believe it has something to do with public relations, and still others literally have no idea how it.
formal to harm the good reputation of someone or something. blemish verb. to spoil someone’s reputation or career. cheapen verb. to make someone or something seem less valuable or respected. demean verb. formal to make people have less respect for someone. demonise. Free thesaurus definition of to harm someone s reputation from the.
a respected oncologist whose reputation brought her patients from all over the world Synonyms of respected esteemed, estimable, name, prestigious, recognized, reputable, reputed, respectable.
Respect is a way of treating or thinking about something or someone. If you respect your teacher, you admire her and treat her well. People respect others who are impressive for any reason, such as being in authority — like a teacher or. Pros.
Now is a great time to join currclickblog.com The company is established enough that it is steadily generating revenue, but young enough that you get double digit growth, startup culture and a meaningful work from the get-go/5().
a state of having a particular kind of reputation for doing something. (Often a bad reputation, as in the examples. *Typically: get ~; have ~; give someone ~.) You'll get a reputation for cheating.
I don't want to get a reputation for being late. stake one's reputation on someone or something.Download